NORDP Mentoring Dyad Reflection: Chetna Chianese and Kadir Jun Ayhan

The  NORDP Mentoring Program matches members in either 1:1 dyad or 1:3 cohort matches annually, with open registration starting in April each year. Chetna Chianese was matched as a mentor and Kadir Jun Ayhan as a mentee in the 2025-2026 NORDP Mentoring Program.

Chetna Chianese, Ph.D., Syracuse University

Portrait of Chetna Chianese
Chetna Chianese, Ph.D.

Dr. Chetna Chianese is the Senior Director of Research Development at Syracuse University, serving as the lead for the central RD office since 2023. Prior to her appointment, Chetna was the Associate Director in the same office, working there since 2019. She has also served as the Associate Director of Research for Syracuse University’s research center for energy and environment.

Before arriving at Syracuse University, Chetna spent three years as a AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. She also served as a program manager for SAIC at the Naval Research Labs in Washington DC. Chetna has a Ph.D. in inorganic chemistry from the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill and a B.S. in chemistry from Vanderbilt University. Within NORDP, she currently serves as Co-Chair of the Nominating Committee and co-convener of Career Stories. She has served previously as Region II Co-Chair and a member of the Member Services Committee.

Kadir Jun Ayhan, Ph.D., James Madison University

Portrait of Kadir Jun Ayhan
Kadir Jun Ayhan, PhD

Kadir is the Associate Director of Research Development at James Madison University. He helps build institutional research capacity by supporting working groups, facilitating interdisciplinary research clusters and convergence teams, developing incentive mechanisms, supporting proposal development, occasionally writing large institutional grant proposals, coordinating complex proposals, fostering international research collaborations with internal and external stakeholders, and overseeing the work of college-based Research Development Associates and Managers.

Before joining James Madison University, Kadir served as an Associate Professor of International Relations at Ewha Womans University in Seoul. He earned his Ph.D. in International Studies from Seoul National University. Kadir is also active in NORDP communities, including the Alliance for International Research Development (AIRD), Competitive Intelligence Working Group and the AI in RD Peer Mentoring Group.

Q1: What influenced you to apply to be a mentor and a mentee for the 2025-2026 NORDP Mentoring Program?

Kadir: I was a faculty member in South Korea before transitioning into the research development profession last year. My experience with grants had been solely from a faculty perspective. Our office is also quite new, and I am part of the team that has been building our research development services from the ground up. I was eager to learn as much as possible about best practices and about this field, which I did not even know existed until recently. When I saw the opportunity to participate in the NORDP Mentoring Program, I felt it was a great chance to learn about best practices, explore career paths in the profession, and discuss new ideas with someone experienced in the field.

Chetna: I’ve been participating in the mentoring program for 5 years now, first as a mentee and now as a mentor. It’s been hugely rewarding to me to learn from others. I love hearing how others approach their situations and circumstances.

Q2: What is your favorite part of your relationship?

Kadir: Chetna is the kindest and most helpful mentor I could have hoped for. Personally, I am quite independent and find it extremely difficult to ask for favors. Because mentoring relationships tend to be somewhat one-sided, with the mentee receiving support from the mentor, I was somewhat hesitant at first. However, Chetna’s welcoming and approachable personality made it very easy for me to contact her with any question or request I had.

Chetna: Kadir is an extremely thoughtful professional. He is constantly seeking to improve and has so many ideas. What he lacked was the history with research development. I loved hearing his ideas and being able to share with him how it relates to my knowledge of RD and peer institutions. It was also motivating to me to think of new ways to approach my own programs.

Q3: How has participation in the Mentoring Program helped broaden your horizons about Research Development in general and/or affected your daily work in particular?

Kadir: As our office is still in the early stages of development, an important part of my role has been preparing benchmarking reports based on best practices at other institutions and making recommendations to our leadership about what might work well at our university. I learned a great deal from my own online research and from attending the 2025 NORDP virtual conference, but what I learned from Chetna was on an entirely different level. Whenever I asked her about specific programs, mechanisms, processes, or workflows, she generously provided detailed explanations, not only about what her office does, but also about approaches they had tried that proved less effective. She also shared workflows and templates that I was able to adapt in my own work. The resources she provided improved our efficiency and were truly eye-opening for both me and our office. I believe I learned more about research development through this mentorship relationship with Chetna than I might have learned on my own in several years.

Chetna: Mentoring Kadir helped me to think more deeply about my own work. Explaining our office’s programs and workflows to Kadir made me articulate the reasoning behind decisions I had made years earlier. It reminded me that a lot of what feels obvious to me after a decade is genuinely useful information for someone early in their RD career. It has pushed me to document and share more of what we do rather than assume it is not worth writing down.

Q4: What surprised you about being a mentor or a mentee?

Kadir: What surprised me most about being a mentee was realizing how much dedicated time for strategic thinking this relationship created for me. I recently told someone that I try to be more strategic and proactive in my work, rather than simply reacting to whatever comes across my desk. They asked me how much time I actually set aside for strategic thinking. That question made me realize that the most intentional time I spend thinking strategically is when I prepare the agenda for my meetings with Chetna, during our conversations, and while implementing what I learn from our discussions and the resources she shares. It was a real aha moment for me.

Chetna: What surprised me most was how much I reconsidered my own processes based on Kadir’s questions. His perspective, coming from a faculty background and a brand-new office, gave me a different lens on how we approach RD.

Q5: What made you decide to maintain a longer-term mentoring relationship, and how has it impacted you?

Kadir: I was new to research development and to administrative leadership in higher education at a U.S. university. There was so much to learn, and I was eager to keep learning, especially because I was gaining so much from my conversations with Chetna. I always came away with new questions and new insights. Another factor was the promotion I received halfway through our mentoring relationship. Stepping into a leadership role in the central office meant that I needed even more guidance, and Chetna was always incredibly open and supportive. I hope we can continue our relationship, and that, over time, there may also be opportunities for me to share a thing or two with Chetna.

Chetna: Once we started, it was easy to keep going. Kadir came to every conversation with questions and follow-through, so I could see the relationship was making a difference for him. That made it easy to keep prioritizing our meetings. I have definitely learned from Kadir and he’s shared a lot with me, particularly his ability to organize complex information sources.

Q6: Any words of wisdom or encouragement for those wanting to apply next year? Any other thoughts you would like to share?

Kadir: I have already encouraged a colleague, who is also new to the research development profession, to apply for the mentoring program and shared how much it benefited me. They have already begun their mentorship program. I strongly encourage anyone who is new to the profession to consider this wonderful opportunity and learn from the generous mentors who are so willing to share their experience and wisdom. I would also emphasize NORDP’s advice that “the mentee drives the relationship.”

Chetna: My advice to anyone considering the program, as a mentor or a mentee, is to devote the time for it every month. The relationship works best when the mentee comes prepared with specific questions and the mentor is generous with the details, not just the big picture. Kadir would email me his agenda before the meeting, and I would think carefully about my answers before we met. I would also encourage people not to wait until they feel like an expert to become a mentor. Some of the best insight comes from people who are still relatively early in their own careers.

Dyad Mentoring Reflection: Becky Milczarek and Brady Liss

by the NORDP Mentoring Committee

The traditional mentoring dyad (1:1 mentor-mentee) program has been a NORDP member feature since 2012. The Cohort Mentoring Group, piloted in July 2022, consists of matching three mentees with similar interests with one shared mentor. Both the dyad and cohorts are matched based on the WisdomShare matching algorithm. 

This month, we caught up with a dyad mentee-mentor pair, Brady Liss (Mentee) and Becky Milczarek (Mentor) from the 2024-2025 mentoring program year to share their experiences with NORDP.


Becky Milczarek (she/her), mentor
Assistant Director, Office of Research Development
University of Illinois Chicago

Rebecca (Becky) Milczarek, Ph.D., University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) • Becky is an Assistant Director in the campus-level Office of Research Development at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). Dr. Milczarek’s formal training is in Food Science and Chemical Engineering, and she spent the first decade of her career in the roles of researcher and proposal reviewer in the federal government before pivoting to academic RD in 2021. Becky elevates the UIC research enterprise by connecting investigators with collaborators and funding, managing the limited submissions process for the campus, and guiding early career and seasoned investigators alike toward a reviewer-centric approach to proposal narrative development.

Brady Liss (he/him), mentee
Grant Proposal Developer
University of Vermont

Brady Liss, PhD, University of Vermont • Brady is a Grant Proposal Developer for the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Vermont. Brady completed his PhD in Anthropological Archaeology at the University of California San Diego, before joining the Research Development team in May 2023. As archaeology is uniquely situated at the intersection of the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences, he leverages his previous research experiences to best support faculty across a variety of departments and disciplines in the college.

Q1: What influenced you to apply to be a mentor and a mentee for the 2024-2025 NORDP Mentoring Program?

Brady: Like many research development professionals, I didn’t anticipate (or frankly even know about) a career in research development until I applied for my current position as a grant proposal developer at the University of Vermont. In turn, I was looking for opportunities to develop professionally in this new (to me) field. The NORDP Mentoring Program seemed like the perfect opportunity to gain insights from someone with more experience. Further, as I can find networking in larger settings intimidating or overwhelming, the opportunity to join a 1:1 dyad was very appealing!

Becky: I had previous positive experiences as a mentee in a NORDP mentoring dyad in 2022-2023 and a cohort in 2023-2024. Although I’m still relatively new to the field of RD, I felt confident enough to start paying it forward as a mentor in 2024-2025. I still recognize I have a lot to learn, though, and thus also participated as a mentee in 2024-2025 – I really enjoyed being a part of a “mentorship sandwich” and am continuing this approach in the current program year. 

Q2: What is your favorite part of your relationship?

Brady: My favorite part about my mentor-mentee relationship with Becky was the open and fluid conversations. We established specific topics for each of our monthly meetings, but allowed the conversation to naturally progress to other subjects. I also enjoyed the opportunity to discuss navigating the current federal funding landscape in a multi-generational NORDP mentor-mentee meeting; Becky’s former mentor joined the conversation.

Becky: For better or worse, it was really “misery loves company” in the 2024-2025 academic year. All in the RD profession will recognize the myriad challenges and upheavals during this period, and it was grounding to have regular, candid conversations with a colleague going through the same experiences. 

Q3: How has participation in the Mentoring Program helped broaden your horizons about Research Development in general and/or affected your daily work in particular?

Brady: My participation in the mentoring program certainly broadened my horizons concerning research development. Sometimes as a grant proposal developer, I can become hyper-focused on supporting the individual grant. However, research development is bigger than any one grant. Meeting with Becky helped reiterate this concept. For example, we explored issues of inclusive language and transparency in funding announcements, leveraging LinkedIn to expand resources and connections, engaging with other fields entirely, etc. Based on Becky’s insights and suggestions, I am exploring new avenues to raise awareness about research development careers among archaeologists. 

Becky: My discussions with Brady gave me a deeper appreciation for both the diversity of RD activities and the commonalities across the profession. Nominally, Brady and I do not have much overlap in our day-to-day RD responsibilities: Brady primarily supports proposal development within a college, while I focus on campus-wide faculty professional development, funding opportunity discovery, and limited submissions. It was enlightening for me to hear more about the proposal development side of the shop, and I’m hoping Brady learned a bit about some more upstream RD activities. At the same time, we definitely identified and explored common themes, mostly having to do with better understanding and serving our clientele. Enabling productive communication with various stakeholders, offering the right support at the right time, and navigating a rapidly shifting research funding landscape are (I will declare here) universal RD themes that we touched on this past year. 

Q4: What surprised you about being a mentor or a mentee?

Brady: I don’t think I was necessarily surprised by any particular aspect of being a mentee, but the program did emphasize the unique collegiality of NORDP members (which was a bit of a surprise compared to previous professional organizations I have participated in). Whenever I have a conversation about NORDP, a primary talking point is always the kindness of the members and their willingness to help. Despite being in a slightly different role and having more experience in the field, Becky exemplified this in her openness to discussing any topic of interest and through dedicating her time to this process. 

Becky: I knew the NORDP mentoring program was intended to be mentee-driven, but I was surprised at how graciously Brady took up this mantle. He kept us on track with our discussion topics and was proactive in (re)scheduling our meetings, but he always showed flexibility when new circumstances or opportunities arose. I suppose I should not have been surprised at this! 

Q5: What made you decide to maintain a longer-term mentoring relationship, and how has it impacted you?

Brady: I really value the opportunity to learn from others, especially when they have more and/or different experience(s) in a given space; Becky fits both these qualifications. Being fairly new to research development with a background in the humanities, I was grateful for the opportunity to learn from Becky, who has served as an assistant director of research development for over four years with a background in food engineering. Our meetings were also consistently comfortable, open, and insightful, making it an easy decision to maintain a longer-term mentoring relationship to continue learning and sharing. 

Becky: It was a pleasure to connect with Brady through this program, so I was happy to suggest we touch base a few times a year as we both progress in our careers. I’m looking forward to hearing about Brady’s accomplishments, challenges, and a-ha! moments. 

Q6: Any words of wisdom or encouragement for those wanting to apply next year? Any other thoughts you would like to share? 

Brady: In the past, I likely would have avoided this type of opportunity. I decided to go for it based on two factors: 1) my experiences interacting with research development professionals, which were always cordial, collegial, and kind, and 2) the smaller setting (a 1:1 dyad) with low-stakes (open discussion, one-hour meetings, once per month) sounded ideal. Now having “completed” the program, I am grateful I did, and I would encourage others to do the same.

Becky: NORDP has built a wonderful mentorship infrastructure, so I highly recommend getting involved as a mentee, mentor, or both. Having been in both a cohort and a few dyads, I can say both models have their strengths. Dyads offer more customizability and focus for a mentee with clear goals going into the program. Cohorts provide instant networking and a wider variety of perspectives and experiences. I encourage prospective mentees and mentors to try both options at least once and keep in mind that every mentoring relationship will be different, regardless of the number of folks involved. 

On a practical note – be aware of the program signup window! In early spring, the start of the mentoring year may seem a long way off, but don’t miss your chance to participate. 


Applications for the 2026-2027 mentoring match cycle will open in the spring of 2026 — keep an eye out for NORDP announcements. Additional mentoring opportunities are available through the Peer Mentoring Groups that are open for participation throughout the year via the WisdomShare platform [LINK: https://nordpmentoring.mywisdomshare.com/]. Contact the NORDP Mentoring Committee if you have any questions at mentoringprogram@nordp.org.

An investment in mentoring is an investment in you!